The impetus to establish sustainable resource circulation in the Republic of Korea led to the enactment of the Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources, known as the ‘Recycling Act’, in 1992. This law introduced the Deposit-Refund System (DRS), emphasizing the responsibility of producers in promoting resource efficiency. Producers were mandated to place a deposit equivalent to the recycling cost for their items, which will then be refunded based on the volume of materials they recycle on that particular year.
In 2002, a comprehensive amendment to the Recycling Act replaced the Deposit-Refund Scheme with an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system. The government aimed to enhance producers’ engagement in managing their products’ waste by enforcing mandatory recycling measures, rather than offering economic incentives for compliance. While producers bear the legal obligations of recycling waste, the Korean EPR system requires responsibility sharing among various stakeholders, including governments and consumers.
The Recycling Act of 2002 laid the groundwork for Korea’s current EPR system, targeting packaging materials and products including lubricants, batteries, tires, etc. In a further commitment to sustainable resource circulation, the Fundamental Act of Resource Circulation was promulgated in 2016. The legislation underscores Korea’s commitment to reducing waste, promoting high-quality material recycling, and minimizing reliance on incineration and landfilling.
Table 1. Summary of policies, plans, and regulations regarding EPR for packaging in the Republic of Korea.
Policies, Plans, and Regulations | Promulgation Date | Status |
Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources (Law No. 4538) | 8 December 1992 | In effect, amended |
Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources (Law No. 6653) | 4 February 2002 | In effect |
Fundamental Act of Resource Circulation | 29 May 2016 | In effect |
Korea’s EPR system for packaging applies to producers who meet both the criteria based on annual sales and annual production or import weight in the preceding year, as outlined in the table below.
Table 2. The scope of producers and importers subject to EPR obligations for packaging in Korea.
Material | Scope of producers and importers | |||
Annual sales | Annual production or | |||
Manufacturers | Importers | Manufacturers | Importers | |
Carton, metal can, or synthetic resin (plastic; excluding foamed synthetic resin) | More than | More than | More than | More than |
Glass bottle | More than | More than | ||
Foamed synthetic resin (including PSP) | More than | More than | ||
Synthetic resin film/sheet-type packaging material for electrical equipment, etc. | More than | More than |
Packaging items regulated under Korea’s EPR system encompass packaging for various products, including food and beverages, agricultural/fishery/livestock products, detergents, cosmetics, medicinal products and quasi-drugs, etc. that are made of the following materials:
The implementation of the EPR system in Korea is overseen by the Korea Environment Corporation (KECO), a state-owned enterprise authorized by the Ministry of Environment (MoE) to execute its policies. In the realm of EPR for packaging, KECO is tasked with recording production or import data from producers, establishing guidelines for the recycling processes, and monitoring and verifying the recycling performance of producers.
In fulfilling its recovery and recycling obligations, producers and importers have the option to establish individual EPR schemes or collectively join a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO), a choice favored by most producers. The designated PRO for packaging is the Korea Packaging Recycling Cooperative (KPRC), responsible for collecting recycling fees and gathering information and statistics on production, import, and recycling of packaging materials from its members. However, the KPRC is not directly involved in managing collection and packaging; this responsibility falls to the Korea Resource Circulation Service Agency (KORA).
KORA, a state organization under the MoE, facilitates waste collection and recycling by coordinating with local governments, waste management organizations (WMOs), and recyclers. Household waste is collected by local governments, while WMOs, selected through public tenders, handle industrial waste collection. KORA utilizes the recycling fees collected by the PRO to finance waste collection and distribute funds to local governments and WMOs. Moreover, KORA issues service provision agreements with recyclers, assigning them tasks related to recycling and marketing recyclates.
KECO conducts quarterly on-site verifications of producers’ performance in collecting and recycling plastic packaging based on their reported information. Subsequently, KECO submits a report on producers’ compliance with EPR obligations to the MoE. The comprehensive diagram of the Korean EPR system for packaging is depicted below.
The annual implementation schedule of Korea’s EPR system is elaborated in the table below.
Table 3. Implementation timeline of Korea’s EPR scheme for packaging.
Year | Date | Stakeholder | Action |
Previous fiscal year (Y-1) | April 15 | Producers | Submit sales and import record of products and packaging materials to KECO |
April 30 | Producers and PRO | Submit recycling report of the previous year’s implementation | |
July 31 | Government | Announce the recycling charges for producers and cooperatives who fail to meet the recycling mandate | |
August 31 | Producers and PRO | Pay recycling charges to the government | |
December | Government | Announce mandatory recycling rate for each item | |
Current fiscal year (Y) | January 31 | Producers and PRO | Submit recycling plan to fulfill recovery and recycling obligation to KECO |
February | KECO | Approve producers’ and PRO’s recycling plans | |
February | Producers and PRO | Implement recycling plans to fulfill obligation |
The MoE announces the mandatory recycling rate for each item annually, considering factors such as recycling market conditions, collection and recycling capacity, and economic circumstances. The graph below illustrates the mandatory recycling rates for select packaging items from 2008-2024, presented on a four-year basis.
Producers falling short of meeting their recycling obligation face recycling charges, which are calculated as the recycling cost for the unmet portion plus a 30% surcharge. The government issues notifications regarding payment obligations annually on July 31st, with payments due by the August 31st of the same year.
Table 4. Roles and responsibilities under Korea’s EPR scheme.
Responsibility | Upstream | Downstream | |
Product Design | Collection | Recycling | |
Physical responsibility | Producer | Local government | Recyclers |
Financial responsibility | Producer | Producers | Producers |
The impetus to establish sustainable resource circulation in the Republic of Korea led to the enactment of the Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources, known as the ‘Recycling Act’, in 1992. This law introduced the Deposit-Refund System (DRS), emphasizing the responsibility of producers in promoting resource efficiency. Producers were mandated to place a deposit equivalent to the recycling cost for their items, which will then be refunded based on the volume of materials they recycle on that particular year.
In 2002, a comprehensive amendment to the Recycling Act replaced the Deposit-Refund Scheme with an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system. The government aimed to enhance producers’ engagement in managing their products’ waste by enforcing mandatory recycling measures, rather than offering economic incentives for compliance. While producers bear the legal obligations of recycling waste, the Korean EPR system requires responsibility sharing among various stakeholders, including governments and consumers.
The Recycling Act of 2002 laid the groundwork for Korea’s current EPR system, targeting packaging materials and products including lubricants, batteries, tires, etc. In a further commitment to sustainable resource circulation, the Fundamental Act of Resource Circulation was promulgated in 2016. The legislation underscores Korea’s commitment to reducing waste, promoting high-quality material recycling, and minimizing reliance on incineration and landfilling.
Table 1. Summary of policies, plans, and regulations regarding EPR for packaging in the Republic of Korea.
Policies, Plans, and Regulations | Promulgation Date | Status |
Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources (Law No. 4538) | 8 December 1992 | In effect, amended |
Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources (Law No. 6653) | 4 February 2002 | In effect |
Fundamental Act of Resource Circulation | 29 May 2016 | In effect |
Korea’s EPR system for packaging applies to producers who meet both the criteria based on annual sales and annual production or import weight in the preceding year, as outlined in the table below.
Table 2. The scope of producers and importers subject to EPR obligations for packaging in Korea.
Material | Scope of producers and importers | |||
Annual sales | Annual production or | |||
Manufacturers | Importers | Manufacturers | Importers | |
Carton, metal can, or synthetic resin (plastic; excluding foamed synthetic resin) | More than | More than | More than | More than |
Glass bottle | More than | More than | ||
Foamed synthetic resin (including PSP) | More than | More than | ||
Synthetic resin film/sheet-type packaging material for electrical equipment, etc. | More than | More than |
Packaging items regulated under Korea’s EPR system encompass packaging for various products, including food and beverages, agricultural/fishery/livestock products, detergents, cosmetics, medicinal products and quasi-drugs, etc. that are made of the following materials:
The implementation of the EPR system in Korea is overseen by the Korea Environment Corporation (KECO), a state-owned enterprise authorized by the Ministry of Environment (MoE) to execute its policies. In the realm of EPR for packaging, KECO is tasked with recording production or import data from producers, establishing guidelines for the recycling processes, and monitoring and verifying the recycling performance of producers.
In fulfilling its recovery and recycling obligations, producers and importers have the option to establish individual EPR schemes or collectively join a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO), a choice favored by most producers. The designated PRO for packaging is the Korea Packaging Recycling Cooperative (KPRC), responsible for collecting recycling fees and gathering information and statistics on production, import, and recycling of packaging materials from its members. However, the KPRC is not directly involved in managing collection and packaging; this responsibility falls to the Korea Resource Circulation Service Agency (KORA).
KORA, a state organization under the MoE, facilitates waste collection and recycling by coordinating with local governments, waste management organizations (WMOs), and recyclers. Household waste is collected by local governments, while WMOs, selected through public tenders, handle industrial waste collection. KORA utilizes the recycling fees collected by the PRO to finance waste collection and distribute funds to local governments and WMOs. Moreover, KORA issues service provision agreements with recyclers, assigning them tasks related to recycling and marketing recyclates.
KECO conducts quarterly on-site verifications of producers’ performance in collecting and recycling plastic packaging based on their reported information. Subsequently, KECO submits a report on producers’ compliance with EPR obligations to the MoE. The comprehensive diagram of the Korean EPR system for packaging is depicted below.
The annual implementation schedule of Korea’s EPR system is elaborated in the table below.
Table 3. Implementation timeline of Korea’s EPR scheme for packaging.
Year | Date | Stakeholder | Action |
Previous fiscal year (Y-1) | April 15 | Producers | Submit sales and import record of products and packaging materials to KECO |
April 30 | Producers and PRO | Submit recycling report of the previous year’s implementation | |
July 31 | Government | Announce the recycling charges for producers and cooperatives who fail to meet the recycling mandate | |
August 31 | Producers and PRO | Pay recycling charges to the government | |
December | Government | Announce mandatory recycling rate for each item | |
Current fiscal year (Y) | January 31 | Producers and PRO | Submit recycling plan to fulfill recovery and recycling obligation to KECO |
February | KECO | Approve producers’ and PRO’s recycling plans | |
February | Producers and PRO | Implement recycling plans to fulfill obligation |
The MoE announces the mandatory recycling rate for each item annually, considering factors such as recycling market conditions, collection and recycling capacity, and economic circumstances. The graph below illustrates the mandatory recycling rates for select packaging items from 2008-2024, presented on a four-year basis.
Producers falling short of meeting their recycling obligation face recycling charges, which are calculated as the recycling cost for the unmet portion plus a 30% surcharge. The government issues notifications regarding payment obligations annually on July 31st, with payments due by the August 31st of the same year.
Table 4. Roles and responsibilities under Korea’s EPR scheme.
Responsibility | Upstream | Downstream | |
Product Design | Collection | Recycling | |
Physical responsibility | Producer | Local government | Recyclers |
Financial responsibility | Producer | Producers | Producers |