Green procurement is the purchase of products, services, and work which have a minimal environmental impact. It can contribute to local, regional, national, and international sustainability and enhance cost-effective use, maintenance, and the final disposal of products; lower the cost of water and energy; and help attain environmental targets, such as the reduction of environmental impacts and the promotion of sustainable production (European Union, 2016; APEC Committee on Trade and Investment, 2013).
The life cycle approach is fundamental in green procurement because it helps the measurement of the environmental performance of a whole process, including production, transportation, procurement, and disposal. Governments and the market/industry control the success of green procurement. Governments are also in charge of developing a sound policy framework, collecting commitment to greening purchasing from producers and politicians, setting environmental requirements, advertising standards, training, monitoring, and conveying the benefits of green procurement. The market/industry is responsible for environmental standards in the market, training, and the certification of green procurement (APEC Committee on Trade and Investment, 2013).
Japan was the first Asia-Pacific country to implement green procurement to reduce environmental degradation, with the Eco Mark Program, which came into force in 1989, and was the country's first green procurement milestone (APRSCP, 2014). The programme was initiated by the Japan Environment Association, in cooperation with the Ministry of Environment and other organisations. It operates in accordance with the principles and standards of the International Organisation of Standardisation (ISO). The Eco Mark Programme covers a range of products, including recycled plastic such as household and industrial textiles, stationery and office supplies, plastic, furniture, and refillable and resource-saving containers.
Japan promotes green purchasing in a number of ways, such aslaunching the Action Plan for Greening Government Operations in 1995, establishing the Green Purchasing Network in 1996, and enacting the Act on Promotion of Procurement of Eco-Friendly Goods and Services by the State and Other Entities in 2000 (Nakahara, n.d.). The act obliges all government ministries and entities to implement green purchasing policies, release their own procurement policies, and report them to the Ministry of Environment.
Green procurement efforts are decentralised to local governments, who are responsible for formulating annual green procurement policies and implementing them upon integration with national regulations. The law regulates categories for eco-friendly products mainly designed based on the Eco Mark Programme (APRSCP, 2014). Products from recycled plastic covered by this regulation include stationery, office furniture, imaging equipment, computers, mobile telephones, home electronic appliances, uniforms and work clothes, and interior fixtures and bedding.
Although the products listed in the regulation refer to Eco Mark, several Eco Mark products have a higher standard for plastic recycled material used. For instance, the recycled plastic material in ballpoint pens must be 70%, while the law requires only 40% (Japan Environmental Association, n.d.,b; Ministry of the Environment of Japan, 2019). Thus, Eco Mark is considered a leader in green procurement in Japan (Nakahara, n.d.)
In Thailand, public procurement contributes 20% of the national economy, so promoting a green procurement policy encourages manufacturers to produce more green products. Thailand has taken several steps to foster green procurement. The Pollution Control Department is tasked by the minister of natural resources and environment to implement the green procurement policy. Unlike Japan, Thailand has no legal framework for green procurement. However, it released two green public procurement (GPP) plans in 2008–2011 and in 2013–2016 (APRSCP, 2014).
The first GPP plan aimed to promote green procurement in government, with central and local government agencies as target groups (Suksod, 2015; UNEP, 2017). The second targeted a wider range of groups, including public organisations, universities, the private sector, and the public, and also encouraged behavioural change for more sustainable consumption (Suksod, 2015). Although green procurement is voluntary, the two plans have specific goals that must be achieved (Table 1).
First Green Public Procurement Plan | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of implementing authorities (national scale) | ≥ 25% | ≥ 50% | ≥ 75% | ≥ 100% |
Spending on green products/services | ≥ 25% | ≥ 30% | ≥ 40% | ≥ 60% |
Second Green Public Procurement Plan | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
Number of implementing authorities (local) | ≥ 10% | ≥ 15% | ≥ 30% | ≥ 50% |
Number of implementing authorities (universities and public organisations) | ≥ 50% | ≥ 60% | ≥ 70% | ≥ 100% |
Spending on green products/services | ≥ 70% | ≥ 75% | ≥ 80% | ≥ 90% |
Source: UNEP (2017)
The Ministry of Industry and the Thailand Environment Institute launched the Thai Green Label. in 1994, as a guide for green public procurement products. It has 27 product categories, including recycled plastic. Two other labels, Green Cart and Green Leaf, regulate designated green procurement products and hotels, respectively.
The Republic of Korea’s Ministry of Environment enacted the Act on the Promotion of the Purchase of Eco-Products in 2005, making it the second country to regulate the purchase of eco-products. The act promotes the eco-product market by requiring green product procurement to minimise environmental pollution and support sustainable development. The Ministry of Environment is responsible under the law for formulating environmentally friendly product guidelines, while government agencies are responsible for buying green products with the Korean Eco-label, Energy Saving Mark, or Good Recycled Mark. The labels cover a range of products, including recycled plastic products, furniture, and household appliances. The act increased green purchasing products from US$255 million in 2004 to US$850 million in its first year of implementation. To further promote green procurement, the government provides information on the green products information platform and in the standard green procurement ordinance, shares and disseminates best practices, facilitates green procurement training, and grants fiscal incentives (UNEP, 2017).
Malaysia encourages the use of green products by prohibiting civil servants from using single-use plastic products, aiming for zero single-use plastic nationwide by 2030. Plastic products, such as plastic wrap; and single-use plates, cups, bowls, straws, and cutlery, are targeted for reduction. People are requested to bring their own food containers and cutlery (Singh, 2019).
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Committee on Trade and Investment (2013), Green Public Procurement in the Asia Pacific Region: Challenges and Opportunities for Green Growth and Trade. http://publications.apec.org/-/media/APEC/Publications/2013/6/Green-Public-Procurement-in-the-Asia-Pacific-Region-Challenges-and-Opportunities-for-Green-Growth-an/TOC/Main-Report.pdf (accessed 9 December 2019).
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Committee on Trade and Investment (nd), Annex B-Factsheets of GPP Policies in 18 APEC member economies. http://publications.apec.org/-/media/APEC/Publications/2013/6/Green-Public-Procurement-in-the-Asia-Pacific-Region-Challenges-and-Opportunities-for-Green-Growth-an/TOC/Annex-B—Factsheets-of-GPP-policies-in-18-APEC-member-economies.pdf (accessed 12 December 2019).
Asia-Pacific Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production (APRSCP) (2014), Report on Ecolabelling and Sustainable Public Procurement in the ASEAN+3 Region: Development of a Feasibility Study for Regional Ecolabelling Cooperation. http://www.aprscp.net/Document/Final%20Report-EL%20&%20SPP%20in%20ASEAN%20+%203.pdf (accessed 10 December 2019).
European Union (2016), Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Policy Procurement, 3rd Edition. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/Buying-Green-Handbook-3rd-Edition.pdf (accessed 9 December 2019).
Japan Environment Association (2007), Introduction of the Eco Mark Program. https://www.ecomark.jp/english/syoukai.html (accessed 12 December 2019).
Japan Environmental Association (n.d., a), Introduction of Product Types (Certification Standards). https://www.ecomark.jp/nintei/ (accessed 12 December 2019).
Japan Environmental Association (n.d., b), Stationery and Office Supplies Version 2.2: Certification Criteria. https://www.ecomark.jp/nintei/112/112V2_a.pdf (accessed 6 February 2020).
Ministry of the Environment of Japan (2017), Act on Promoting Green Procurement. https://www.env.go.jp/policy/hozen/green/attach/gpp%20pamphlet_eng.pdf (accessed 12 December 2019).
Ministry of the Environment of Japan (2019), Basic Policy on Promoting Green Procurement (Provisional Translation). https://www.env.go.jp/en/laws/policy/green/h31bp_en.pdf (accessed 12 December 2019).
Nakahara, H. (n.d.), Current Status and International Contribution of Green Public Procurement (GPP) and Eco-labels in Japan. http://www.env.go.jp/policy/hozen/green/kokusai_platform/symposium/key01.pdf (accessed 4 February 2020).
Singh, S. (2019), ‘Civil Servants Urged to Do Away with Single-Use Plastics’, The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/04/24/civil-servants-urged-to-do-away-with-singleuse-plastics (accessed 4 February 2020).
Suksod, J. (2015), Green Public Procurement in Thailand. https://www.env.go.jp/policy/hozen/green/kokusai_platform/2015symposium/03Thailand.pdf (accessed 9 December 2019).
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2017), Comparative Analysis of Green Public Procurement and Ecolabelling Programmes in China, Japan, Thailand, and the Republic of Korea: Lesson Learned and Common Success Factors. https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/resource/UNEP_green_public_procurement_ecolabelling_China_Japan_Korea_Thailand_report.pdf (accessed 4 February 2020).