The 1972 Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping Wastes and Other Matter (London Convention)

This Convention, also called the London Convention, promotes the control of all sources of marine pollution and takes practicable steps to prevent pollution (IMO, 2019a). Article IV Number 1(a) of the Convention states: ‘The dumping of wastes or other matter listed in Annex I is prohibited’. Paragraph 4 of Annex I specifies persistent plastics and other synthetic materials (e.g. nettings and ropes), which might float or remain in suspension in the sea in a manner that could interfere with fishing, navigation, or other legitimate uses of the sea. Paragraph 11(d) of Annex I calls for the maximum removal of materials capable of creating floating debris or contributing to marine pollution from vessels and platforms or other man-made structures at sea. These provisions indicate that the Convention is still generally applied to discharges from land-based and not sea-based litter. Therefore, broader interpretation is needed to cover all sources of marine debris (Lentz, 1987). Table 1 shows the status of adoption of the Convention by the ASEAN+3 countries. The Philippines is the only ASEAN country that has ratified the Convention.

Table 1. Status of Adoption of the London Convention

Countries

Status of Adoption (date)*

Signature

Ratification

Accession

Acceptance

Brunei Darussalam 

-

-

-

-

Cambodia

-

-

-

-

Indonesia

-

-

-

-

Lao PDR 

-

-

-

-

Malaysia

-

-

-

-

Myanmar

-

-

-

-

Singapore

-

-

-

-

Thailand

-

-

-

-

The Philippines 

29 December 1972

10 August 1973

-

-

Viet Nam 

-

-

-

-

China

-

-

14 November 1985

-

Japan

22 June 1973

15 October 1980

-

-

Republic of Korea 

-

-

21 December 1993

-

* ‘Signature’ authenticates and expresses the willingness to ratify or accept. ‘Ratification’ defines the international act whereby a state indicates its consent to be bound to a treaty. ‘Accession’ is the act whereby a state accepts the offer or the opportunity to be bound to a treaty which has been negotiated and signed by other states. ‘Acceptance’ has the same legal effect as ratification and consequently expresses the consent of a state to be bound by a treaty. In certain states, ‘Acceptance’ is used instead of ‘Ratification’ when, at a national level, constitutional law does not require the treaty to be ratified by the head of state. Source: UN (1980).

Source: IUCN (1972).

In 1985, the Ninth Consultative Meeting of Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter  issued Resolution LDC.22(9) on environmental hazards caused by the disposal at sea of persistent plastics and other persistent synthetic materials (including fishing nets). This resolution aims to enhance collaboration amongst the Contracting Parties, the Marine Environment Protection Committee, the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, and other competent international bodies in action reporting, technical assistance, related activities, as well as measures for collecting and disseminating information on the hazards to living resources and marine life (IMO, 1985).

In 1996, the Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (London Protocol) was agreed upon to further update, and eventually replace, the Convention (IMO, 2019b). Under the Protocol, all types of dumping are prohibited, except of possibly acceptable wastes. Article 4 Number 1.2 of the Protocol states: ‘The dumping of wastes or other matter listed in Annex 1 shall require a permit. Contracting Parties shall adopt administrative or legislative measures to ensure that issuance of permits and permit conditions comply with provisions of Annex 2. Particular attention shall be paid to opportunities to avoid dumping in favour of environmentally preferable alternatives’. Annex 2 of the Protocol describes the assessment of wastes or other matter that may be considered for dumping, including waste prevention audit; consideration of waste management options; chemical, physical, and biological properties; action list; dump-site selection; assessment of potential effects; monitoring; and permit and permit conditions. The Protocol shows strict procedures that should be completed before certain wastes (including those from vessels and platforms or other man-made structures at sea) can be permitted for dumping. Article 6 of the Protocol also states that Contracting Parties shall not allow the export of wastes or other matter to other countries for dumping or incineration at sea. In short, the Protocol carries out a broader interpretation by considering potential of sea-based litter generated from vessels and platforms or other man-made structures at sea. Table 2 shows the status of adoption to the Protocol by the ASEAN+3 countries.

Table 2. Status of Adoption of the London Protocol

Countries

Status of Adoption (date)* 

Signature

Ratification

Accession

Acceptance

Brunei Darussalam 

-

-

-

-

Cambodia

-

-

-

-

Indonesia

-

-

-

-

Lao PDR 

-

-

-

-

Malaysia

-

-

-

-

Myanmar

-

-

-

-

Singapore

-

-

-

-

Thailand

-

-

-

-

The Philippines 

-

-

09 May 2012

-

Viet Nam 

-

-

-

-

China

23 March 1998

29 September 2006

-

-

Japan

-

-

02 October 2007

-

Republic of Korea 

-

-

-

22 January 2009 

* ‘Signature’ authenticates and expresses the willingness to ratify or accept. ‘Ratification’ defines the international act whereby a state indicates its consent to be bound to a treaty. ‘Accession’ is the act whereby a state accepts the offer or the opportunity to be bound to a treaty which has been negotiated and signed by other states. ‘Acceptance’ has the same legal effect as ratification and consequently expresses the consent of a state to be bound by a treaty. In certain states, ‘Acceptance’ is used instead of ‘Ratification’ when, at a national level, constitutional law does not require the treaty to be ratified by the head of state. Source: UN (1980).

Source: IUCN (1996).

Japan, China, the Republic of Korea, and the Philippines have followed up the ratification of the Convention and Protocol in certain legal frameworks and implementations.

On 20 July 2007, Japan promulgated the Basic Act of Ocean Policy. Article 18 of this Act states: ‘The State shall take necessary measures to conserve the marine environment including … reduction of the pollution load caused by water flow into the oceans, prevention of the discharge of waste materials to the oceans …’. A related regulation is the Law Relating to the Prevention of Marine Pollution and Maritime Disasters, which includes control of waste from and on ships. This law requires companies to find specific places of discharge within the sea area of discharge designated by the national government, perform an environmental impact assessment prior to dumping, and conduct monitoring after dumping (Zou and Zhang, 2017). Ship owners also have to register their ships to the Commandant of Japan Coast Guard, to ensure compliance with the technical standards for securing proper discharge of wastes. Another relevant regulation is the Waste Disposal and Public Cleaning Law, enacted to preserve the environment and improve public health through restriction of waste discharge, appropriate sorting, storage, collection, transport, recycling, disposal, or the like, and conservation of a clean living environment (Zou and Zhang, 2017).

In China, the State Oceanic Administration is implementing the Marine Environmental Protection Law (MEPL). In 1999, the MEPL was amended with the addition of some principles of sustainable development such as control mechanisms for quantity of pollution, environmental impact assessment requirements for coastal and marine construction projects, and the ‘polluter pays’ principle (Zou and Zhang, 2017). After its accession to the London Convention, China adopted in 1985 the Regulations Concerning Dumping of Wastes at Sea and, in 1990, the Measures for Implementation of the Regulations Concerning the Dumping of Wastes at Sea. In 2003, China began implementing the Provisional Measures on the Management of Dumping Sites. Under these measures, any person or entity who intends to dump waste must secure a permit from the State Oceanic Administration, indicating the waste-dumping entity; terms of validity, quantity, and category of wastes; and the method of dumping (Zou and Zhang, 2017). Any person or entity with a permit should dump wastes according to the requirements specified in the permit. Furthermore, Article 11 of the MEPL regulates the dumping fees. The fees are considered so low, however, that polluters would rather pollute than reduce or eliminate pollutants from their origin (Xu, 2006). China Marine Surveillance, a law enforcement agency, is mandated to inspect China’s jurisdictional waters (Zou and Zhang, 2017). Waste dumping without a permit is subject to a fine of no less than RMB30,000 but no more than RMB200,000.

The Republic of Korea adheres to the Convention, having adopted in 2007 the Marine Environmental Management Act (MEMA), which replaced the Marine Pollution Preservation Act, which had been in force since 1997. The MEMA provides for prevention of marine pollution from (1) marine vessels, offshore facilities, etc.; (2) ocean dumping in the territorial sea under the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone Act, the sea area as designated by a presidential decree, and the exclusive economic zone under the Exclusive Economic Zone Act; (3) environment management sea areas designated by the minister of land, transport and maritime affairs; and (4) in sea-bed mining areas designated under the Submarine Mineral Resource Development Act.

The Philippines is implementing the Convention and Protocol through the Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004. The Act prohibits dumping in water bodies or along the margins of any surface water, which could result in water pollution or block the natural flow of water. The Philippine Coast Guard implements the Act through the Philippine Coast Guard Law of 2009.

The 1972 Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping Wastes and Other Matter (London Convention)

This Convention, also called the London Convention, promotes the control of all sources of marine pollution and takes practicable steps to prevent pollution (IMO, 2019a). Article IV Number 1(a) of the Convention states: ‘The dumping of wastes or other matter listed in Annex I is prohibited’. Paragraph 4 of Annex I specifies persistent plastics and other synthetic materials (e.g. nettings and ropes), which might float or remain in suspension in the sea in a manner that could interfere with fishing, navigation, or other legitimate uses of the sea. Paragraph 11(d) of Annex I calls for the maximum removal of materials capable of creating floating debris or contributing to marine pollution from vessels and platforms or other man-made structures at sea. These provisions indicate that the Convention is still generally applied to discharges from land-based and not sea-based litter. Therefore, broader interpretation is needed to cover all sources of marine debris (Lentz, 1987). Table 1 shows the status of adoption of the Convention by the ASEAN+3 countries. The Philippines is the only ASEAN country that has ratified the Convention.

Table 1. Status of Adoption of the London Convention

Countries

Status of Adoption (date)*

Signature

Ratification

Accession

Acceptance

Brunei Darussalam 

-

-

-

-

Cambodia

-

-

-

-

Indonesia

-

-

-

-

Lao PDR 

-

-

-

-

Malaysia

-

-

-

-

Myanmar

-

-

-

-

Singapore

-

-

-

-

Thailand

-

-

-

-

The Philippines 

29 December 1972

10 August 1973

-

-

Viet Nam 

-

-

-

-

China

-

-

14 November 1985

-

Japan

22 June 1973

15 October 1980

-

-

Republic of Korea 

-

-

21 December 1993

-

* ‘Signature’ authenticates and expresses the willingness to ratify or accept. ‘Ratification’ defines the international act whereby a state indicates its consent to be bound to a treaty. ‘Accession’ is the act whereby a state accepts the offer or the opportunity to be bound to a treaty which has been negotiated and signed by other states. ‘Acceptance’ has the same legal effect as ratification and consequently expresses the consent of a state to be bound by a treaty. In certain states, ‘Acceptance’ is used instead of ‘Ratification’ when, at a national level, constitutional law does not require the treaty to be ratified by the head of state. Source: UN (1980).

Source: IUCN (1972).

In 1985, the Ninth Consultative Meeting of Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter  issued Resolution LDC.22(9) on environmental hazards caused by the disposal at sea of persistent plastics and other persistent synthetic materials (including fishing nets). This resolution aims to enhance collaboration amongst the Contracting Parties, the Marine Environment Protection Committee, the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, and other competent international bodies in action reporting, technical assistance, related activities, as well as measures for collecting and disseminating information on the hazards to living resources and marine life (IMO, 1985).

In 1996, the Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (London Protocol) was agreed upon to further update, and eventually replace, the Convention (IMO, 2019b). Under the Protocol, all types of dumping are prohibited, except of possibly acceptable wastes. Article 4 Number 1.2 of the Protocol states: ‘The dumping of wastes or other matter listed in Annex 1 shall require a permit. Contracting Parties shall adopt administrative or legislative measures to ensure that issuance of permits and permit conditions comply with provisions of Annex 2. Particular attention shall be paid to opportunities to avoid dumping in favour of environmentally preferable alternatives’. Annex 2 of the Protocol describes the assessment of wastes or other matter that may be considered for dumping, including waste prevention audit; consideration of waste management options; chemical, physical, and biological properties; action list; dump-site selection; assessment of potential effects; monitoring; and permit and permit conditions. The Protocol shows strict procedures that should be completed before certain wastes (including those from vessels and platforms or other man-made structures at sea) can be permitted for dumping. Article 6 of the Protocol also states that Contracting Parties shall not allow the export of wastes or other matter to other countries for dumping or incineration at sea. In short, the Protocol carries out a broader interpretation by considering potential of sea-based litter generated from vessels and platforms or other man-made structures at sea. Table 2 shows the status of adoption to the Protocol by the ASEAN+3 countries.

Table 2. Status of Adoption of the London Protocol

Countries

Status of Adoption (date)* 

Signature

Ratification

Accession

Acceptance

Brunei Darussalam 

-

-

-

-

Cambodia

-

-

-

-

Indonesia

-

-

-

-

Lao PDR 

-

-

-

-

Malaysia

-

-

-

-

Myanmar

-

-

-

-

Singapore

-

-

-

-

Thailand

-

-

-

-

The Philippines 

-

-

09 May 2012

-

Viet Nam 

-

-

-

-

China

23 March 1998

29 September 2006

-

-

Japan

-

-

02 October 2007

-

Republic of Korea 

-

-

-

22 January 2009 

* ‘Signature’ authenticates and expresses the willingness to ratify or accept. ‘Ratification’ defines the international act whereby a state indicates its consent to be bound to a treaty. ‘Accession’ is the act whereby a state accepts the offer or the opportunity to be bound to a treaty which has been negotiated and signed by other states. ‘Acceptance’ has the same legal effect as ratification and consequently expresses the consent of a state to be bound by a treaty. In certain states, ‘Acceptance’ is used instead of ‘Ratification’ when, at a national level, constitutional law does not require the treaty to be ratified by the head of state. Source: UN (1980).

Source: IUCN (1996).

Japan, China, the Republic of Korea, and the Philippines have followed up the ratification of the Convention and Protocol in certain legal frameworks and implementations.

On 20 July 2007, Japan promulgated the Basic Act of Ocean Policy. Article 18 of this Act states: ‘The State shall take necessary measures to conserve the marine environment including … reduction of the pollution load caused by water flow into the oceans, prevention of the discharge of waste materials to the oceans …’. A related regulation is the Law Relating to the Prevention of Marine Pollution and Maritime Disasters, which includes control of waste from and on ships. This law requires companies to find specific places of discharge within the sea area of discharge designated by the national government, perform an environmental impact assessment prior to dumping, and conduct monitoring after dumping (Zou and Zhang, 2017). Ship owners also have to register their ships to the Commandant of Japan Coast Guard, to ensure compliance with the technical standards for securing proper discharge of wastes. Another relevant regulation is the Waste Disposal and Public Cleaning Law, enacted to preserve the environment and improve public health through restriction of waste discharge, appropriate sorting, storage, collection, transport, recycling, disposal, or the like, and conservation of a clean living environment (Zou and Zhang, 2017).

In China, the State Oceanic Administration is implementing the Marine Environmental Protection Law (MEPL). In 1999, the MEPL was amended with the addition of some principles of sustainable development such as control mechanisms for quantity of pollution, environmental impact assessment requirements for coastal and marine construction projects, and the ‘polluter pays’ principle (Zou and Zhang, 2017). After its accession to the London Convention, China adopted in 1985 the Regulations Concerning Dumping of Wastes at Sea and, in 1990, the Measures for Implementation of the Regulations Concerning the Dumping of Wastes at Sea. In 2003, China began implementing the Provisional Measures on the Management of Dumping Sites. Under these measures, any person or entity who intends to dump waste must secure a permit from the State Oceanic Administration, indicating the waste-dumping entity; terms of validity, quantity, and category of wastes; and the method of dumping (Zou and Zhang, 2017). Any person or entity with a permit should dump wastes according to the requirements specified in the permit. Furthermore, Article 11 of the MEPL regulates the dumping fees. The fees are considered so low, however, that polluters would rather pollute than reduce or eliminate pollutants from their origin (Xu, 2006). China Marine Surveillance, a law enforcement agency, is mandated to inspect China’s jurisdictional waters (Zou and Zhang, 2017). Waste dumping without a permit is subject to a fine of no less than RMB30,000 but no more than RMB200,000.

The Republic of Korea adheres to the Convention, having adopted in 2007 the Marine Environmental Management Act (MEMA), which replaced the Marine Pollution Preservation Act, which had been in force since 1997. The MEMA provides for prevention of marine pollution from (1) marine vessels, offshore facilities, etc.; (2) ocean dumping in the territorial sea under the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone Act, the sea area as designated by a presidential decree, and the exclusive economic zone under the Exclusive Economic Zone Act; (3) environment management sea areas designated by the minister of land, transport and maritime affairs; and (4) in sea-bed mining areas designated under the Submarine Mineral Resource Development Act.

The Philippines is implementing the Convention and Protocol through the Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004. The Act prohibits dumping in water bodies or along the margins of any surface water, which could result in water pollution or block the natural flow of water. The Philippine Coast Guard implements the Act through the Philippine Coast Guard Law of 2009.